For investigation teams
Give Phantom Agent a research question. It checks relevant public sources and organizes what it found, what remains unanswered, and where to look next.
Outcome preview
Company
Subject
Main finding
conflicting records
The website's 2017 operating claim conflicts with a 2020 incorporation and a 2021 first archived appearance.
01
Sources cited
02
Open questions marked
03
Next checks suggested
Illustrative finding. Actual sources and results vary.
How it works
One investigation, organized into a report your team can examine.
1 of 3
Question
Set the question, known facts, and any limits that should guide the work.
Research
Phantom Agent checks sources that fit the question and follows useful leads as they appear.
Report
Your investigator receives an organized report and decides what the evidence means.
Example report
For review
Research question
Check whether this company's website, operating history, and public records tell the same story.
Synthetic example. Sources and results vary.
In progress
01
Question
Set the question, known facts, and any limits that should guide the work.
02
Research
Phantom Agent checks sources that fit the question and follows useful leads as they appear.
03
Report
Your investigator receives an organized report and decides what the evidence means.
Example report
For review
Research question
Check whether this company's website, operating history, and public records tell the same story.
Main finding
The website's 2017 operating claim conflicts with a 2020 incorporation and a 2021 first archived appearance.
Sources checked
Website, registry, archive, and address records support the date conflict and the new company lead.
Still unanswered
Public sources do not establish beneficial ownership.
Where to look next
Review authoritative filings for the shared address and ownership history.
Synthetic example. Sources and results vary.
Ready for review
In their words
I've been using Phantom Agent for OSINT investigations. It's been useful for getting a quick first pass on a subject, finding leads and connections, and working out what to look into next. I still check the important findings myself, but it gives me a good starting point and helps me follow different threads.
Anonymous investigator
Where teams use it
01
Check claims about a company, its owners, and its operations against public records.
02
Connect entities, addresses, filings, timelines, and public ownership leads for review.
03
Follow public clues about identities, domains, impersonation, and payments.
Available public sources and providers vary by target and jurisdiction.
Your investigator checks the sources, identity matches, and legal relevance before using the report.
Investigation content is not used to train models or for routine human review.
How access works
Requesting access starts a conversation about your workflow and current source coverage.
01
Tell us about a recurring investigation and any jurisdiction or security constraints.
02
Begin with one guided investigation using suitable public, closed, synthetic, or de-identified material.
03
If the work fits, agree the scope and terms of a limited founding pilot before it begins.
A later founding pilot may be paid. It begins only after you agree to its scope and terms.
In silence, patterns emerge.
Investigation tools for professional teams that need to keep the sources, reasoning, and next steps together.
© 2026 Phantom Helix · Operated by Yuhao Jian · ABN 52 512 969 796
Built in Melbourne for professional investigation work.